fixbg.uk is in beta testing · applications and enquiries are not being accepted at this time
fxbg.uk REVIEWS POLICY · v1
Reviews policy FILE / 007 · LAST REVISED 08.05.26

Honest reviews
matter more than
polished claims.

Customers may leave reviews about work introduced through fixbg.uk. We do not promise that every review will be positive. A useful platform is one that reflects what actually happened. This page sets the standard we ask both customers and traders to work to.

How fixbg.uk works → Reviews appear on each trader’s profile and on relevant project journal entries

01What we ask customers

We ask reviews to be:

1.1 Honest. Say what you actually experienced, in your own words.

1.2 Specific. Name the job, the time of year, the kind of problem if there was one. “Excellent” tells nobody anything; “rebuilt the stone wall in three weeks for the price quoted, cleaned the site every day, came back twice to fix the lime plaster crack” tells the next reader what to expect.

1.3 Based on real experience. A review must come from the actual customer who hired the trader through fixbg.uk. Not a friend, not a family member, not a competitor, not an industry observer.

1.4 Fair about strengths and weaknesses. If something went badly, say so. If something went well, say that too. The most useful review is the one that names both.

CLAUSE 01 · CUSTOMER STANDARD

02What we may edit

We may edit reviews for:

2.1 Clarity. Tightening sentences that obscure the point.

2.2 Length. Trimming a 2,000-word review to a publishable size.

2.3 Privacy. Removing names, addresses or sums of money the customer would not want public.

2.4 Obvious abuse. Slurs, threats, doxxing, libel, content that would expose us to legal action.

We do not edit reviews to reverse their meaning. If you wrote a critical review, the published version remains a critical review. If we edit substantially, we will tell you what we changed and why.

CLAUSE 02 · EDITORIAL HAND

03Trader right of reply

Where appropriate, the trader may reply to a review in their own words. The reply is published alongside the review, never instead of it. Both views remain visible to future readers.

We will sometimes include a brief editorial note where context helps the reader understand a dispute. We do not take sides in genuine disagreements; we publish both sides and let readers decide.

CLAUSE 03 · PUBLISHED ALONGSIDE

04What we will not publish

4.1 Reviews from people who did not actually hire the trader through fixbg.uk.

4.2 Reviews that read like spam, paid promotion, or a competitor smear.

4.3 Reviews containing slurs, threats, defamatory factual claims we cannot verify, or material that would expose either party to legal risk.

4.4 Reviews that copy or paraphrase another platform’s review without the customer’s consent.

If we decline to publish a review, we will tell the customer why.

CLAUSE 04 · UNPUBLISHED

05If a review describes a serious complaint

A negative review is not the same thing as a complaint. We publish negative reviews routinely and they do not, on their own, suspend the trader. If a review describes something that would meet the bar for a serious complaint under the complaints policy (incomplete work, abandonment, major scope deviation, failure to remedy a material defect, conduct causing serious harm), we will get in touch with the customer separately and run the complaint process.

CLAUSE 05 · OVERLAP WITH COMPLAINTS

For customers leaving a review

Write what would have been useful to know before you hired the trader. Strengths, weaknesses, what went well, what did not. Specific beats general every time.

REVIEWS POLICY v1
PUBLISHED 08.05.26
NEXT REVIEW 08.11.26
HONEST · SPECIFIC · FAIR
SIGNED ADRIAN DANE